Quantcast
 

Is McCain Really Bush the III? Find Out Where They Differ

Tue, 06/17/2008 - 11:15am by CitizenSugar
361 Views - 51 comments

While some are figuring out which ditty is going to be the big summer song, Republicans are gearing up to hear months of a Democratic refrain on endless repeat. The tune? John McCain is George W. Bush in older sheep's clothing.

To find out whether they're twinsies more like Lindsay Lohan in The Parent Trap or Arnold Schwarzenegger and Danny Devito in Twins, consider where they differ:

  • Arms Control: McCain wants a new arms control accord with Russia, nuclear talks with China, and a complete disarmament of North Korea's nuclear program.
  • Interrogation Tactics: He considers waterboarding illegal and impermissible.
  • Federal Spending: McCain's a stronger opponent of wasteful spending.
  • Energy and Oil: He's called for a "great national campaign to put us on a course to energy independence," saying th next president must be willing to "break completely" with the previous energy policies.
  • Climate Change: He supports cap and trade and wants a global accord that includes China and India.

The two agree on issues like education, immigration, Iraq, and health care. Check out the whole list to see how.

Not content just to compare McCain to Bush? To see how McCain and Obama's voting records stack up, read more.

Obama's camp has made much of McCain's voting allegiance with Bush. According to records, in 2007 McCain did vote in conjunction with the president's position 95 percent of the time – up from 77 percent in 2005 and 67 percent in 2001. He voted with his party 90 percent of the time.

By contrast, Obama's votes were in line with the president's position a not-too-slim 40 percent of the time in 2007. In 2006 he voted alongside the George W Bush in almost 50 percent of votes cast.

Obama also appears more partisan than McCain according to these numbers: Obama voted in line with fellow Senate Democrats 97 percent of the time in 2007 and 2005, and 96 percent of the time in 2006.

Do you think McCain is an extension of Bush? Or should the endless refrain be that he marches to his own drummer?

Source

on Yahoo!

51 Comments Add a Comment

  • hypnoticmix's picture
    hypnoticmix
    1

    No surprises but I would say to the Obama campaign that it is a bit misleading to suggest that Sen. McCain agreed with the President 95% when Sen. Obama agreed with the President 40% of the time which would bring their point on McCain’s agreement with the President down to 55%. Ahh the power of suggestion what a trip.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • hypnoticmix's picture
    hypnoticmix
    3

    That's my honey Michael isn't he a dish. Well enjoy while he lasts I can only use his photo for one day and he said no fighting. I guess he doesn't want to get chased down the street for my views, LOL!

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • syako's picture
    syako
    4

    it looks like he could hold his own during a street fight Eye-wink but who would ever want to fight you anyway hypno? Smiling

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • stephley's picture
    stephley
    5

    Nice try, but no cigar. McCain looks more like Bush than I thought. If you click through to the times list, you've got them mostly agreeing on 14 issues, mostly disagreeing on 8 - and its 8 only when you count different facets of energy and oil separately.
    All talk on the environment, not much really offered on energy,

    Your description of the percentages is a little shaky - Obama is MORE partisan, because he voted with his party 97% of the time compared to McCain's 90%? The difference is pretty slim.

    McCain's joining with the president moving from 77% to 95% in two years is worth a raised eyebrow - did he initially plan on running as Bush III?

    Obama's votes were in line with the president's position a NOT-TOO-SLIM 40 percent of the time in 2007? That's less than half the time.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • bellaressa's picture
    bellaressa
    7

    I thought McCain and Bush look different, different people, different stances - I could be wrong. B/c Bush is no rifle man.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • hypnoticmix's picture
    hypnoticmix
    8

    Yeah girl I've had to settle him down a couple of times before he put a hurtin on somebody, LOL!

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • lilkimbo's picture
    lilkimbo
    9

    Stephley, if you just count numbers of things they agree or disagree on, you're right. However, McCain's strategy in Iraq would have been completely different from Bush's, which he voiced from the start. A $1,500 tax credit for insurance is a lot smaller than a $5,000 tax credit, as well. McCain has also readily admitted that No Child Left Behind needs a lot of work. Some of the things they claim Bush and McCain agree on are not clear agreements.

    Also, I highly doubt McCain started shifting his voting patterns to try to run for a third Bush term, seeing as Bush's popularity has been much lower during his later terms in office.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • cine_lover's picture
    cine_lover
    11

    And Hurray we have another vote on the McCain side. Welcome Caterpillar! McCain was not my first choice either, but he is growing on me, and I can't stand Obama, so that eases the pain a bit Eye-wink

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • hypnoticmix's picture
    hypnoticmix
    13

    Hey HF last time I saw Hillary she was at a bar in Philly tossing back a shot. Haha! Just kidding.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • lilkimbo's picture
    lilkimbo
    15

    HF, Hillary is on the cover of New York Magazine. She looks quite lovely.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • harmonyfrance's picture
    harmonyfrance
    17

    That's what I like to hear hypno! I would do a shot with her anyday.

    Really lil? I'll have to check it out. Thanks. Smiling

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • Jillness's picture
    Jillness
    19

    "McCain wants a new arms control accord with Russia, nuclear talks with China, and a complete disarmament of North Korea's nuclear program."

    And yet he also wants to kick Russia out of the G8, and wants to keep China out. Does he really think that he can insult them and pursuade them at the same time?

    Ultimately, McCain is more like Bush than he is different from him....which isn't really surprising because they are both Republicans. The little details might be different for McCain, but the big picture is clearly similar.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • Jillness's picture
    Jillness
    20

    "McCain's strategy in Iraq would have been completely different from Bush's, which he voiced from the start."

    McCain either matched or went beyond President Bush's rhetoric in making a case for war.

    In October 2002, McCain railed against Saddam Hussein shortly before the Senate passed a resolution to use force in Iraq. "He has developed stocks of germs and toxins in sufficient quantities to kill the entire population of the Earth multiple times," McCain argued on the Senate floor. "He's placed weapons laden with these poisons on alert to fire at his neighbors within minutes, not hours, and has devolved military authority to fire them to subordinates. He develops nuclear weapons, with which he would hold his neighbors and us hostage."

    Doesn't sound that different from Bush to me...

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • yesteryear's picture
    yesteryear
    21

    im happy that i get to vote for someone i truly like, rather than just voting for someone i kind of like because i hate the other guy more.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • smart boy's picture
    smart boy
    22

    I DO NOT THINK HE CAN BE ANOTHER BUSH HE HAS MORE SENCE THAN THAT HE IS A SMART MAN I THINK THE WAR WAS ON HIS MIND BUT WHY I WOULD NOT FOR ANY BUSH FOR DOG CATCHER

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • stephley's picture
    stephley
    23

    Lil, it's the unclear part that would concern me - but I wouldn't vote for him anyway so...

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • KrisSugar's picture
    KrisSugar
    25

    YY, I think it's awesome that you get to vote for someone you really and truly like. how rare is that? Smiling

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • lilkimbo's picture
    lilkimbo
    26

    Jillness, you should re-read what I said. I said McCain's strategy would have been different from Bush's. McCain would have sent more troops over and pushed for a surge well before Bush. I did not say that McCain's view on going to war was different.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • lilkimbo's picture
    lilkimbo
    27

    Steph, I'm saying that the arguments the linked article is making are unclear. They are making stronger connections than actually exist.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • lilkimbo's picture
    lilkimbo
    29

    I'm glad for you, too, yy, but I don't think voting for someone who would not have been your first choice necessarily means you are voting for someone you don't like. It is also no less honorable than voting for someone you really like. In either case, you are voting for the viable candidate who you believe will best lead the country.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • cine_lover's picture
    cine_lover
    30

    No I do not like McCain because I hate Obama more. It just makes it easier for me vote for someone who was not my first choice. Just making a little joke, because a lot of us on this site McCain was not our first choice. Does not mean I don't like him, he is just not as Conservative as I am.

    Tiff I am with you. Cap and Trade is one thing I very much so do not agree with McCain on.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • Jillness's picture
    Jillness
    31

    "Does not mean I don't like him, he is just not as Conservative as I am."

    Is anyone as conservative as you are? Eye-wink Tee hee!

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • stephley's picture
    stephley
    32

    Lil, I think the reference to voting for someone you like is more of an issue we've had as liberals (I think this is what YY meant). Kerry wasn't my first or second choice and is a bit of an a$$ so I was voting for someone I didn't like.
    I liked Edwards coming in to this, so Obama is my second choice, but I still like him. People felt passionate about Hillary Clinton and Obama... That's a luxury liberals haven't had in some time.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • mymellowman's picture
    mymellowman
    33

    I wish would could get McCain to trade in Cap and Trade for some Cap'n Crunch (with Crunch Berries, of course..)

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • lilkimbo's picture
    lilkimbo
    34

    I see what you're saying, Stephley. I didn't mean to really direct the second part of that comment at yy. It's just that I have heard many, many times (and a lot of them were on this site) comments to the effect of, "I'm so sad for you that you just have to vote for someone you don't like." or "I'm glad Democrats have a candidate they can actually get behind, unlike Republicans." And I know that these comments are often said in an insulting manner. (Not always, but at times.)

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • lilkimbo's picture
    lilkimbo
    35

    Anyway, if I leave in the next few minutes, I can get out of work early! I have a small window! Yay!

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • cine_lover's picture
    cine_lover
    37

    "I'm so sad for you that you just have to vote for someone you don't like." or "I'm glad Democrats have a candidate they can actually get behind, unlike Republicans."

    I hear and read that ALL the time.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • stephley's picture
    stephley
    38

    Liberals anyway are used to holding their noses and punching the chad.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • cine_lover's picture
    cine_lover
    39

    steph, I will never understand how the Dems got Kerry as a candidate. I mean did they want to lose?

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • syako's picture
    syako
    40

    So this is way off topic, but my whole office was just watching the LSU basesball game, and we were down by three in the last inning and we just WON! Woohoo THAT MEANS WERE STILL IN THE COLLEGE WORLD SERIES Walk like an Egyptian Walk like an Egyptian Geaux Tigers!

    Oh my gosh, what a great game. Sticking out tongue

    ok, back on topic...

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • stephley's picture
    stephley
    41

    Ask the leadership - IMO they always go with the candidate that seems most middle of the road, pleasing no one. I'm frankly surprised that Obama is the nominee, I thought in the end they'd find a way to make it Clinton

    To you guys our candidates seem liberal or worse; as someone who's liberal or worse, they seem like quaint Democrats from 1964.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • hausfrau's picture
    hausfrau
    43

    I don't put a ton of stock in this because it ignores the "nuances"... Jill tells me all about nuances and dagnabit, I beleive her! Smiling

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • hausfrau's picture
    hausfrau
    44

    I think if McCain would have been president in 2001 then we'd be in a very different situation now.

    That alone tells me he's different enough from Bush to make significant changes for the better.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • True Song's picture
    True Song
    45

    I agree, it's more important what they agree on than what the percentages are.

    Also, am I reading this right, we're seeing voting with your party as a bad thing? When did partisan become a bad word? I get so nettled by people who go on about not voting for someone based on their party or not supporting something just because it's proposed by a certain party. I'm not a democrat because my favorite color is blue; I'm a democrat because of the values of the party, so it makes sense that most of the time I'd support the party's propositions and its candidates.

    Does that mean if all the democrats jumped off a bridge I'd do it, too? Of course not, but party is a significant and relevant factor.

    22 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment