Quantcast
 

Are You Buying These Vibrating Mascaras?

Fri, 10/24/2008 - 5:00am by bellasugar
996 Views - 27 comments

There's a considerable amount of buzz about two mascaras: Ôscillation from Lancôme ($34) and TurboLash ($30) from Estée Lauder. The dueling products both promise to add volume, length and curl to lashes through their vibrating wands. TurboLash sold out immediately upon its July debut, and Ôscillation had 21,000 names on a waiting list before launching this week.

Of the two, I've tried only TurboLash. It's a good mascara that delivers natural-looking, long and separate lashes. But it's not as though manually wiggling mascara through my eyelashes is a huge burden, so I doubt I'll replace regular mascaras with vibrating ones permanently. What about you — have you tried these? Are you interested?

on Yahoo!

Related Bella Stories

Related Network Stories


 
 
 

27 Comments Add a Comment

  • deanna024's picture
    deanna024
    1

    This sounds like the biggest load of crap from a cosmetic company, if ever I heard of one.

    How about people just get hopped up on coffee and use their jittery, shaky hands to apply the mascara? That would get the same result and you'd save $30.

    A few months ago, I was shopping in the mascara aisle at the drugstore and this lady asked me if I had ever used a certain kind that was on sale. I said I had, and added, "Not like it matters. They're all the same anyway!"

    She started laughing in agreement.

    I think mascara brands capitalize on the placebo effect -- they hype themselves up and you believe your lashes look longer/fuller/fatter/whatever, when really, it's the same as always.

    11 weeks 9 hours ago Report Comment
  • nv27's picture
    nv27
    3

    I'd try it, they're not really any more expensive than Lancome's regular mascaras. And there is a HUGE difference between cheap mascara and expensive. Wear Covergirl or Revlon for a couple days, then try Christian Dior's Diorshow, and you can't deny there is a HUGE diff. I swear by Diorshow.

    11 weeks 9 hours ago Report Comment
  • nv27's picture
    nv27
    4

    I agree, the whole vibrating thing is gimmicky, but, I'd still try it.

    11 weeks 9 hours ago Report Comment
  • brandi07's picture
    brandi07
    5

    This is too gimmicky for me. Also it seems rather expensive, even Diorshow is cheaper than this.

    11 weeks 9 hours ago Report Comment
  • CCee's picture
    CCee
    6

    I think the vibration would probably make me mess up. I like having control and I don't need it to create great lashes, I can just wiggle the wand myself.
    I do however want to try the Givenchy Phenomen mascara (yes even more control Eye-wink )

    11 weeks 8 hours ago Report Comment
  • iheartshoes511's picture
    iheartshoes511
    8

    I just bought the lancome mascara, and I LOVE it! I don't have to curl my lashes any more.

    11 weeks 7 hours ago Report Comment
  • imcs's picture
    imcs
    9

    I poke my eyes enough with a steady wand, I don't want to think of what would happen if it's constantly vibrating! ouch!

    11 weeks 7 hours ago Report Comment
  • bailaoragaditana's picture
    bailaoragaditana
    13

    I just think these are a bit silly. I definitely won't be buying them - I have enough issues keeping mascara off my lids as it is, I don't need extra help! Plus, like CCee said, the control issue is major. I like to control things in any/all aspects that I can.

    Also, $30-$34 is like two or more of my usual mascaras. The most expensive mascara I've ever bought is Fresh/Firebird at $26. And that's 2x my normal mascara. So no way, José!

    11 weeks 4 hours ago Report Comment
  • VanillaJ's picture
    VanillaJ
    15

    I've been a Hypnose girl since my high school years. After reading a numerous comments about not needing to spend tons on a good mascara, I decided to try out something cheaper, yet I couldn't fully trust drugstore brands. I went to try Zoomlash by M.A.C, and the result was atrocious. Zoomlash is supposed to be the 'it' mascara which lengthens and gives volume.

    I eventually ended up getting Givenchy Phenomen. It takes more minutes than Hypnose, but it's great and fun. However, when I finish up my Phenomen, I might switch back to Hypnose.

    When it comes to most beauty items, there's a reason that it's more expensive.

    10 weeks 6 days ago Report Comment
  • angelfromlsu's picture
    angelfromlsu
    16

    I use everything MAC except mascara. I use another drugstore kind because I replace mine every 4 weeks. I don't advise using products that do animal testing but the Maybelline Define a Lash wand is amazing. I just keep the wand and use it in my Jane mascara Smiling Works like a charm.

    If the wand went side by side it would be more useful than random vibrating. Even with the vibrating wand, I would buy it once and reuse the wand.

    I used to be a Lancome and Dior fanatic. So many better things.

    10 weeks 6 days ago Report Comment
  • CCee's picture
    CCee
    17

    I've seen video's of Givenchy's Phenomen and it really does work. I like to controll the mascara because I like more mascara on my outer lashes then my inner lashes.

    10 weeks 6 days ago Report Comment
  • krissycake's picture
    krissycake
    20

    haha, so, i am totally surprised this is actually a real product. i was for sure, from the title, that it was a different kind of...ahem,,,'product.'

    10 weeks 6 days ago Report Comment
  • shhbabytee's picture
    shhbabytee
    22

    I had a friend try out the Lancome Oscillation one and she said it got all over the place and didn't work. It's an interesting idea for a mascara but if that is supposed to be better than all the rest... then why is Lancome/Estee Lauder/ etc. still selling the other non-vibrating stuff? I think formula is the most important part of a mascara.. well, that and a good brush. I think I brush the mascara on just fine - I don't need that part to be mechanized...And I certainly don't need to pay for it.

    10 weeks 5 days ago Report Comment
  • lizlee89's picture
    lizlee89
    23

    haha, deanna that is hilarious! yeah, I just don't see how the vibration would have any affect. I'd try it though, why not?

    10 weeks 5 days ago Report Comment
  • LadyLiLa83's picture
    LadyLiLa83
    24

    I agree that it's gimmicky. I know you're supposed to wiggle the brush back and forth when you apply mascara, but I'm thinking I could do it myself...I don't need already-expensive mascara to be any more expensive, thank you.

    10 weeks 5 days ago Report Comment

Leave a Comment

To post comments, please log in or register.



Morsels of goodness, delivered daily.

Enter your email below:
 
 
 
     
     
     











    ©1976-2009 Sugar Inc. | Privacy (updated July-4-2008) | Terms of Use | Copyright Policy | Advertise | Contact Us